Possibilities and Realities
When we are optimistic, we need a dose of realism. When we are pessimistic, we need to maintain a view of good things that are possible.
Wishful thinking can be fun,
but it can often get in the way
of accomplishing the things that we need to do,
and even doing or getting the things we want.
Wishful thinking can be caused
by inappropriate optimism
or by an attempt to escape
from inappropriate pessimism.
We can be enabled or disabled
by pessimism or optimism, either one.
When pessimism points us
toward thinking realistically,
it can enable us.
When it discourages us from taking action,
by leading us to ask, "What's the use?"
it can disable us.
The latter, asking, "What's the use?"
would be a form of inappropriate pessimism.
When optimism encourages us to take action,
by leading us to believe
that our actions will do some good,
it can enable us.
When optimism devolves,
when it winds down, into wishful thinking,
leading us to believe that all will be well
without anyone's effort,
it disables us.
Believing that all will be well without anyone's effort
would be a form of inappropriate optism.
One way to understand optimism versus pessimism
would be an approach to healthy relationships.
All relationships involve
being together and being apart.
Optimism refers to the boundaries
which we all need.
Pessimism refers to the territories
which we all may feel that we need to defend.
The reality is, as the song by Chicago says,
"Even lovers need some time
away from each other."
There is nothing wrong with that need,
and mutual respect brings us the realism
that will enable us
to accept each other
and our needs as we are.
The antidote for too much optimism
or too much pessimism
is a healthy dose of realism.
When we are realistic,
we are willing to take a clear-eyed look
at the realities around us.
Sometimes we try to hide from those realities
because of the realities are just too scary,
because of fear,
but a saying that has helped me
many times in my life
is, "Perfect love casts out fear."
[1 John 4:18 and ACIM]
Realistically, there is no such thing as perfect love,
but it can be a goal.
Love is stronger even than death,
so surely it is stronger than fear.
[Song of Solomon 8:6]
As I spoke of it a couple of weeks ago,
love is not just a feeling.
Love is action, caring for one another
as well as for ourselves.
The arc of the moral universe
will bend toward justice
so long as we continue to bend it by our actions.
Participating in moving toward justice
can help us avoid the extreme ends
of optimism or pessimism.
Right actions will always bend the arc
of the moral universe
toward justice.
The good side of religious life
encourages us to do what we can
to move ourselves, our communities,
our nations and our world
toward justice.
Sadly, too much of religious life involves dogmatism
rather than moral or right action.
Dogmatism without right action has enabled
many of the problems
we have lived with for generations.
People can justify all kinds of evil actions
in the name of promoting their own religions,
some sincere individuals believing
that the doctrines of their faith
are more important
than anyone's personal morality,
including their own.
We are faced with some important choices
in the world of religion in our time.
Will we move toward doctrines
as the most important expression of faith,
or will we move toward actions that care for others
as the most important expression of faith?
The answer remains to be seen
in a lot of collective thoughts, words, and deeds.
I'm quite certain of the direction
we as UU's hope we will move,
that is, toward positive, moral action
as the expression of our faith.
It's one of the reasons, I believe,
that we have associated ourselves
with the Unitarian Universalists.
As a Lutheran minister,
I have grappled with the evangelical tradition
that we are justified entirely by grace
without any consideration of works of the law,
without concern for the things that we can do.
The Lutheran faith tradition would seem
to work against the importance of right action
as the most important expression of faith,
but in reality it doesn't often happen that way.
The question at the heart of the matter
involves what we mean by the word, "faith."
My experience, both personally
and in community with others,
has been that faith means grappling
with the issues of life,
especially the issues of right and wrong,
regardless of the conclusions we reach.
In other words, people of faith can (and often do)
come to different conclusions about
the important social and personal questions
of the time in which we live.
I am pessimistic about the idea
that we will come to agreement
about the right actions we all need to take.
I'm optimistic about the possibilities for the future
when people do work together
for the common good.
Reality calls me to look for things we can agree on
so that we can work together,
even if the areas of agreement are small.
Sometimes we have to start small
before we can accomplish anything at all.
Our faiths give us a starting place
for working together,
and I find what I believe is a realistic hope
in the starting place of our faiths.
Orthodoxy in religion
is concerned with getting all the ideas right.
A corresponding word, orthopraxy,
is concerned with engaging in the actions
that will lead to more justice,
to better conditions of life for everyone.
Faith can be summarized, to describe it again, as
Orthodoxy vs. Orthopraxy - dogma vs. principle
doctrine vs. action
religious law vs. personal morality.
Personal morality, as I understand it,
refers to the commandment to love our neighbor.
A pessimistic approach would warn us of
the conflict between works righteousness
and faith alone,
justification by faith vs. justification by works.
A simple summary of reality says that
we need faith AND works.
Consider St. James, who said in his epistle,
"Tell me of your faith,
and I by my works will SHOW you my faith."
[James 2:18]
Not limited by denominational lines,
these differences are deep within religious groups.
The contrast is between hard liners and progressives
in any denomination or religion.
Optimism says principle is on the rise.
Pessimism says dogmatism will always prevail.
Realism says it will be a struggle,
but the arc of the moral universe
will continue to bend
toward justice, toward principle
rather than toward dogma.
The bend toward justice will not happen
without effort.
It isn't automatic.
It's natural, but we will have to work toward it.
Part of the hard work will be looking clearly
on what has happened and what is happening.
Good government will be able to help.
There can be
a Truth and Reconciliation Commission
like those in use in other countries
that have gone through trauma and danger
resulting from bad government.
Anglican Archbishop Desmond Tutu of South Africa,
with his close ally, Nelson Mandela,
established the Truth and
Reconciliation Commission in the 1990's
to enable the newly fully democratic
Republic of South Africa
to move on from the horrors of apartheid.
Nancy Pelosi recently promised a commission
like the one that investigated 9/11
to look into the events around the attempt
at sedition and insurrection against
the U.S. capitol on January 6.
Pessimism would claim that such commissions
make no difference at all in the unfolding of history.
Optimism would claim
that they provide complete resolution.
The reality is that such commissions
are not final answers,
but they are at least the beginning
of a process of healing.
The healing that we need as a nation
is not just wishful thinking.
It can be a new beginning for us all,
an opportunity for transformation.
I HAVE to believe at least in the possibility.
Amen.
So let it be.
Blessed be.