The Meaning of Love
1 Corinthians 13:4-7
4 Love is patient; love is kind; love is not envious or boastful or arrogant
5 or rude. It does not insist on its own way; it is not irritable or resentful;
6 it does not rejoice in wrongdoing, but rejoices in the truth.
7 It bears all things, believes all things, hopes all things, endures all things.
Someday, after mastering winds, waves, tides and gravity, we shall harness the energy of love,
and for the second time in the history of the world humankind will have discovered fire.
- Pierre Teilhard de Chardin
"You know it's love when all you want is for that person to be happy, even if you're not part of their happiness."
Respect is a very important part of love.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rabbi Jesus was a teacher in the pharasaic rabbinical school of Hillel,
who was very nearly an elder contemporary of Jesus.
It's actually possible that they met at some point.
I'm enough of an agnostic about such things that I'm not even willing
to say anything with a degree of confidence
about the Jesus of history,
but I'm also willing to suspend my disbelief
in order to say meaningful things about Him
as if He really were a well documented
historical figure.
With that in mind,
His teachings clearly placed him within the party of Hillel.
One of their goals
was to find a way to summarize the Law, the Torah,
in the simplest way possible.
Hillel and Jesus both phrased the Golden Rule in one way or another:
Do not do to others what you find hateful if it is done to you.
- or -
Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.
And so on.
Likewise, the rabbis of the Hillel school
sought to summarize the 613 Commandments of the Law
with the most important one or two or ten.
That's where we get the idea of Ten Commandments.
Jesus and Hillel also spoke of the Two Great Commandments:
(1) You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart
and with all our soul
and with all your mind. (!)
(Take that, Ken Ham!!)
(2) You shall love your neighbor as yourself.
If I may, I want to lay aside the First of the Two for now
(apart from my rude remarks about the debate
of Creationism vs. Evolution)
Just considering the Second Great Commandment,
we immediately come up against the question:
How on earth can you command anyone to LOVE??
And that question brings me directly to the heart of today's message.
Basically we all try to remember that there are many different kinds of love.
Some languages have more than one word that we would translate as love.
Ancient Greek and the Greek of the New Testament
had three or four words for love.
I feel sure that contemporary Greek also has and uses all of these words.
I'm not nearly as well versed in the contemporary language as I am
in the Greek of the New Testament, called koine or keenee
as it is actually prounounced.
The use of the Greek language to study the New Testament
and even the Old Testament in its very important Greek translation
is an interesting commentary on the way religious ideas develop.
In the first place, the pronunciation of Greek words
in seminaries and among many Bible scholars
bears no resemblance whatsover
to the way the Greek language is spoken
in real life in the world today.
If only I (and many others) had been taught to use
contemporary Greek pronunciations,
we would be able to understand a lot of spoken Greek even now
and it would be relatively easy for us to learn.
As matters stand, we still have to say, "It's Greek to me!"
In addition,
it was widely believed that the New Testament was written
in a special kind of Greek
that was just used for theological discussions.
Just how silly that idea is
can be seen in the fact that the word "Koine" or keenee
to use the modern Greek pronunciation
has been discovered to mean "common!"
When grocery lists and receipts for business transactions
were found to be written in this supposedly
theological form of Greek,
scholars had to admit that the language
of the New Testament
was actually
the language of ordinary, every day life!
What a testimony to the tendency
to try to make religion into something apart from
the struggles of ordinary people
in the real world.
One of the things we struggle with -
and the insights of New Testament Greek can help us with -
is the application of the principles
even the Law
of LOVE
to our lives as we live them every day.
C.S. Lewis wrote one of his great treatises in book form,
including the word, storge, or affection, as one of the four loves.
Affection is the feeling of being accustomed to someone.
It may be the most familiar and comfortable kind of love.
The other three Greek words for love are the ones I usually use:
philia - brotherly love, as in the City of brotherly love,
Philadelphia
eros - erotic love, as in libido,
which Mike Huckabee
seems to want to talk about
much too much lately!
AND
agape - caring, as in altruism
or putting the needs of another
above one's own needs.
The best example of the last of these three (or four) loves
is the love a parent for his or her offspring.
The world of nature reflects this love in many ways.
One of the clearest examples
is the way a baby's developing bones
WILL get the calcium he or she needs
while in utero
even if the calcium is taken
right from a mother's teeth.
This love, caring for each other,
is a choice people can make
so it makes sense to think
that it could be commanded.
The form of the commandment in the New Testament
is very important to our understanding of love
as a source of ethics.
The commandment says,
"You shall love your neighbor as yourself."
To me that says clearly that self love
is not only not forbidden,
it is COMMANDED.
In other words,
putting others above oneself may be noble and altruistic,
but that will always be exceptional.
It cannot be part of our everyday lives
because no one could do it on a regular basis!
The whole idea of enlightened self interest
has been much abused by Ayn Rand and her disciples,
but it is a good concept
when it is not taken to an extreme.
The enlightenment of self interest
could be simply
the recognition that other people are also selves
who also have interests,
and they have as much right to pursue their interests
as we have.
The U.S. Declaration of Independence enshrines that right
as universal
with the words
pursuit of happiness.
If we are willing to pursue the fulfillment of our own needs and wants
at the same time that we give equal weight to the rights of others
to do the same,
we are living lives of love
for ourselves and for our neighbors.
In the case of this kind of civic virtue,
love is not just an emotion.
Certainly it carries emotional weight.
The emotions around all kind of love
are among love's most attractive
and most frustrating
features.
Yet often the emotions of love
are the results of choices we have made.
Emotions are neither right or wrong,
and no one can tell another person how to feel.
Yet love that means caring is a choice that we make.
It may result in feelings of sympathy
or even empathy
when we witnes the suffering of another person.
In modern urban settings,
we cannot allow those feelings to dominate us all the time
or we would be unable to function.
This is probably why we read about callous people walking by
when someone is in obvious danger or pain.
At the same time,
allowing ourselves to make the choice to care
can result in a much more liveable city and world.
Maybe even more important,
caring enough to advocate for policies
that provide for the meeting of people's needs -
especially the most basic needs like food, shelter
and human kindness -
can be a most important expression of love.
This very congregation lives out an example of that kind of love
in more than a symbolic fashion:
Like many religious communities of various stripes,
the free will portion of Sunday offerings in this fellowship
are given to various community groups whose work
supports the values of this congregation.
Those values are based on love - as caring -
whether it is described that way or not.
The needs of people who for some reason cannot meet their own needs
are addressed by community organizations
that actually provide care and resources
in ways that individuals
or even a gathering like this one
could not do on our own.
The same sharing of a portion of each Sunday's offering
is observed in the Unitarian Universalist Church of the Palouse
in Moscow
to which Beth and I belong.
In our local customs of giving we see a fine example of caring
for the self as well as for others.
The whole offering is not given away,
only that portion that is not designated for pledges
or local support.
If the whole were given away, there would not long be
a gathered community here.
The commandment of love
calls for us to love our neighbors AS ourselves
not instead of ourselves
and not more than ourselves
Among religious people and groups
there is a tendency to venerate the self giving
that reaches the point of self sacrifice.
This can be a noble example,
but it cannot be
and I believe it is not meant to be
a way of life every day.
Martyrdom is not voluntary,
to put it mildly.
Treating it as voluntary has led to many corruptions
of the whole idea of altruism,
not least of which
is the act of suicide bombings
undertaken by desperate people
to terrorize those they believe are oppressing them.
Such actions are not based in love,
even for the community on whose behalf they are done,
but they are often portrayed that way
by those whose actions are based in hate
and not love.
That brings me to my final thoughts for today's message:
True love, especially the caring love called agape,
is not the opposite of hate.
Both love and hate are forms of caring.
Love seeks the good and well being of the one who is loved.
Hate seeks the harm and destruction of the one who is hated.
If we think in terms of caring,
the opposite of love is actually apathy,
not caring at all.
To seek the good for the one who is loved
implies a need to define that good.
I would define the good of the beloved in terms of freedom.
Anything that enhances the freedom of someone we care about
is the good we are called to seek for her or him.
Obviously that does not always characterize the feelings of love:
if freedom could allow the beloved to choose against me,
I would not want to enhance that freedom!
Yet true, caring love
is characterized by exactly that kind of freedom.
If I am not what is best for a person I love,
in the sense of caring,
then I do not want to be that person's choice.
This kind of altruistic love is beautifully represented
in a quote I recently saw on Facebook:
"You know it's love when all you want is for that person to be happy,
even if you're not part of their happiness."
This kind of altruistic love is beyond me -
and most of us -
most of the time.
Yet it is the goal of true loving
both as a personal and as a civic virtue.
It enables us to care about -
- and receive care from -
people we cannot like.
It enables us to live in life-enhancing relationships
with people who are very different from ourselves.
It might even allow people of very different values and ideologies
to work together for the common good in our society
and in the society of all of our world.
In the words of the great Christian theologian and paleontologist,
Pierre Teilhard de Chardin,
Someday, after mastering winds, waves, tides and gravity, we shall harness the energy of love,
and for the second time in the history of the world humankind will have discovered fire.
Amen
So mote it be
Blessed be!