Prophet, Priest, and King
The three categories of prophet, priest, and king are ways of understanding religion and politics in ancient Israel and in our own time.
In the delightful poem by Edward Lear,
the Owl and the Pussycat sailed away
for a year and a day in a beautiful pea green boat.
It was a year and a day ago
that I first presented a sermon
on Prophets, Priests, and Kings.
I offered to continue to speak on the subject,
even with just a little encouragement
from the congregation.
I received an overwhelming response.
A great many people wanted to hear more.
Today begins my continuation of the subject matter.
Its relevance continues for us
and for people all over the world.
Many religious leaders would like to be prophets,
but few are capable of dealing with the rigors
of that sacred trust.
Many political leaders
would like to be kings and queens,
but few are worthy of any such consideration.
There are many priests among religious people,
whether they use the term of priest or not,
and they function in society
as leaders of religious and spiritual functions.
Some of our priests are ordained
as official leaders of religious organizations.
Many more are simply spiritual servants
of other people and of the wider world.
Priesthood is both a function and an official office.
Those who serve in both the function and the office
are often called, "Reverend,"
although many of them
don't care much for the term.
Every priest, bishop, pastor, or member of the clergy
is deeply aware that she or he is no more worthy
of being revered
than any other human being.
This is exactly why I prefer the term, pastor.
I'll say more about priests and priestesses,
and then I'll work my way backwards
through kings and queens
to prophets and prophetesses
before this sermon concludes.
See? I just told you a little bit about
what I'm going to tell you.
I'm openly using the sermon outline
that I spoke about a few weeks ago.
Priests and Priestesses are often understood
primarily as go-betweens.
Traditionally, they were thought to go between
people and God.
Whether people today believe
in God or Goddess or both,
priests and priestesses can be understood
as going between
or bridging the gap
between people, each other,
and their spirituality.
Remember that I understand spirituality
primarily as a matter of breathing.
This doesn't mean that spirituality is limited
to a study of breath and breathing,
but the word "spirit"
does basically mean "breath."
What this says to me
is that breath and breathing
provide us a paradigm for understanding
our relationship with the transcendent reality
of our place in the world and the universe.
We all belong.
We all have a function.
Priests and priestesses are here
to help us understand
how to use our unique abilities
to make the lives of others better.
The function of a priest or priestess
is to help others understand their own function.
No one can do this perfectly, of course.
So a priest or priestess
needs their own priest or priestess,
their own pastor.
A pastor is a shepherd.
A pastor to pastors is a bishop.
We UU's don't have bishops,
but we do have regional executives.
Our own Pacific Western regional executive
recently spoke of the congregations in her care.
By speaking this way, she described perfectly
the function of the bishop,
even if she isn't called a bishop.
A bishop is a pastor to pastors and congregations.
A reading from the Old Testament
a few Sundays ago
assigned by the Revised Common Lectionary
spoke about the shepherds of Israel.
The Revised Common Lectionary
is a schedule of readings from the Bible
used by a number of denominations,
from the Roman Catholic Church
to the United Church of Christ (UCC),
(remember the word, UNITED, there),
the Christian denomination
most closely related to us UU's.
Cindy Matthews tells me that one interpretation
of the abbreviation, UCC, is
Unitarians Considering Christ.
The shepherds of Israel, as referenced
in the RCL reading recently
were the kings (and queens) of ancient Israel.
Many people in Israel today
long for a king like the good ones of old.
Although Netanyahu's name can be interpreted
as "gift from the Lord,"
he has not quite measured up.
Neither have other national leaders
who have aspired to be kings or dictators
in modern times.
If I start talking about would-be kings,
I won't have time to say much else.
So I will simply say that national leaders in our time
are far more effective
if they turn away from too much power
and work for the well being of the people
entrusted to their care.
Actual monarchs, such as the king of Spain,
the Queen of England, and the Queen of Denmark,
have often done better in caring for their people
than elected leaders have done
in many other places.
My point in saying this is not to debate
various systems of choosing leaders of nations
but to show how leadership itself
is meant to be a form of stewardship,
providing care for the people
rather than a method of self aggrandizement.
Beginning with our first president,
George Washington,
the USA has had many such leaders.
Other leaders have not done so well as shepherds.
Those who address the problem of leaders
who are not shepherds
are generally prophets and prophetesses.
Sometimes an entire system of government
is brought down
by the testimony of a prophet,
at least in part.
In the former Soviet Union,
the witness and testimony of the great prophet,
Alexander Solzhenitzyn contributed
far more to the fall of that unjust system
than most people realize.
In South Africa Nelson Mandela
famously contributed to the fall
of the unjust apartheid system of government.
In the U.S.A., the prophet, Martin Luther King,
contributed greatly to the continuing collapse
of the complicated and unjust system
of racial discrimination known as Jim Crow.
Although there are today attempts
at reinstating portions of the Jim Crow system,
I believe that they are doomed to failure,
partly because of prophets
who are speaking out against those attempts.
Prophets are not primarily concerned
with making predictions.
One way of describing the function of prophets
is to say that they comfort the afflicted
and afflict the comfortable.
In doing so
they contribute to the well being of all people.
Social justice calls on everyone
to care for other people,
and prophets call on us all to do exactly that.
So prophets are advocates for social justice.
In this way a prophet may seem to be political,
but there is much more
to a prophet’s work than that.
In every community there are prophets
to this very day,
and they are constantly calling us
to see and to live in the truth,
even when the truth is uncomfortable.
For this very reason
prophets are not always popular people.
Their lives may be at risk
from the powers that be
and from the people whose wealth and power
the prophets may threaten.
The rest of us can do the work
of hearing and heeding the words of the prophets,
which are not always, but sometimes,
written on the subway walls,
as in the "Sounds of Silence"
by Simon and Garfunkel.
At any rate,
the words of the prophets
are very often in unexpected places.
The rest of us can look
in those unexpected places
and share the words of our own prophets
as well as others
to promote the mindfulness and well being
which the prophets themselves
are advocating.
So the prophet, the priest, and the king,
as well as the prophetess,
the priestess, and the queen
are the people in every community
providing a view of well being,
guidance, and leadership
for us all.
As we participate in their work,
we also become part of the well being,
the peace (Salaam, Shalom)
of our own times and places.
Amen.
So let it be.
Blessed be.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home