Progressive and Reactionary Religion
Nearly every religion in the world today has progressive elements that seek openness and freedom and reactionary elements that believe their way is the only way.
As we have looked together
at the wide variety of religious experience
one of my recurring themes has been
the two sides of religion.
I want to think of them as progression vs. regression,
that is, religion can be expressed as
progressive or regressive.
Progressive religion is open to new ideas.
Regressive religion is usually a closed system.
Any religion can be progressive,
but most start out somewhat regressive.
Progress looks forward.
Regression looks to the past.
The two sides of the religious coin can be in balance,
but that kind of experience is rare.
The single most important difference
between progressive and regressive faith
is faith in the faith itself,
faith in a leader
whose own spiritual experience
is normative for everyone.
Far better is a spiritual leader
who can guide her or his followers
into their own spiritual experience.
Regressive religion looks back to the revered leader
requiring everyone to believe their teachings.
Often the revered leader is considered infallible.
A progressive faith is aware of the possibility
of human error creeping into doctrine.
A regressive faith emphasizes divine revelation
and expects its doctrines to be perfect and infallible.
You have probably heard or read
the nearly perfect expression of regressive religion:
"God said it.
I believe it.
That settles it."
Needless to say at this point,
what we often call fundamentalism
is another term
for religion that I am calling regressive.
The divisions between
progressive and regressive faith in our time
are deeper and deeper.
They are triggering an "us vs. them"
kind of tribalism.
It is becoming harder and harder for us
to listen to - or even hear - each other.
I have said for many years
that the differences within religious groups
is greater than the differences between them.
The distinctions within groups are becoming sharper.
There are narrow views of religion
in every tradition.
The acknowledgement that there can be good
in another tradition
is not characteristic of the narrow view
of regressive religion.
That acknowledgement is a precondition
to progressive religion.
What I hope to do in our studies of religions
is to open wide the door
in all our hearts and minds
to learn from each other
and from many others.
Sadly, many of our family, friends and neighbors
who are moving into a more tribal view of faith
will not want to learn much from us,
but we can still learn from them.
Maybe an example of open minded listening
can even set a necessary example
for those who are taking a narrower view.
Of course, it does not always work that way!
To give you a better idea of where I want to go
in months ahead,
I'm talking today about
the most important distinction
between good and evil
in religious commitment.
No matter
what our personal spritual practice may be,
it is our own personal practice,
and we cannot impose it or its principles
on anyone else.
It is good
to have religious beliefs and spiritual practice,
but it is evil to try to impose
our own personal commitments on anyone else.
Dan Brown cited William Blake
in his recent book, Origins.
A wonderful poem is a crucial part
of the denouement of the novel.
In the "Four Zoas"
Blake wrote:
"The dark religions are departed
And sweet science reigns."
To be absolutely blunt,
dark religions are regressive.
Every religion is dark and dangerous
whenever and wherever it is regressive,
simply by believing and proclaiming
that it alone is the truth for everyone.
By doing so it becomes the enemy of science,
including and maybe especially
the scientific study of religion.
Science requires a more open mindedness
regarding any subject under study.
Scientists even have to be open to the possibility
that things they have long believed
may be proven false.
Peer review holds open the chance
that one's own work
may be proven to have been mistaken
at certain points.
Progressive religion would have to be very open
to the scientific study of religion,
including itself.
So far, as we have looked at various religions,
we have only scratched the surface
of the science of religion,
the sociology of religion.
We have looked a little bit at history
and the ways religions have shaped history
and the ways they have been shaped by it.
Now I want to move both forward and backward.
I hope that doesn't mean that I will be
both progressive and regressive (!),
or at least if I must be both,
that I will succeed in keeping
those two possibilities in balance.
I want to move backward
by looking again at some of the religions
we have already looked at.
I want to move forward
not only by looking at some other religions
but also by looking more deeply
into the theologies and practices
of religions we have already looked at.
I hope we can see ways
that we can learn from others
and enhance our own spiritual practices.
I want to be entirely open to ideas from you
about the direction we will continue to go
in our study of other faiths.
Our own Unitarian Universalist faith
is deeply involved in this process
by its very nature.
We provide tools for living a life of faith
with principles of thought, word and action
to enable an ethical life.
(Seven such principles, to be exact.)
[Single word summary by Fred:
1. Worth
2. Compassion
3. Acceptance
4. Search
5. Democracy
6. Community
7. Web]
We also provide tools for each and all of us
to develop our own faith for life,
a way of approaching our own spiritual journeys,
every one of us in our own unique way.
As UU's we are progressive in our religion
at the very heart
of what we stand for.
At the same time, we are in no less danger
than any other form of relgious expression
of developing regressive tendencies.
We are human beings.
We tend to be tribal.
Under stress, we draw inward
to protect ourselves and others like us.
We also sometimes become too enthusiastic
in our critique of each other
and maybe especially of others outside our
living tradition.
We can safeguard our faith and life
in the sweet science of Unitarian Universalism
if we do just a few things:
We can keep our minds open
to lessons from others around us.
We can recognize negative examples
in those who have closed their minds
while trying to defend the things they treasure.
We can open our hearts to disagree with each other
and again especially with those outside our walls
without becoming disagreeable ourselves.
Maybe most importantly,
we can continue to seek
and form alliances with
people of good will
regardless of their background
or religious tradition,
especially those who are not like us.
By doing so
we can make our own faith and practice
far more progressive,
and we can provide a strong witness
to those around us
who lean more to the regressive side.
"Be ours a religion that goes everywhere..."
Be ours a religion that is always open
to learn from others
That is the only way we can encourage people
who are inside closed systems
to open their windows and doors a little bit
and allow the winds of change to enter.
Amen.
Blessed Be!
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home